ABB er bare smågutten i dreping

Jeg tror det ville vært en fordel om en stilte ABB opp mot jesuittene. Ikke bare fordi han ligner på dem som er med i denne militærordenen, (Han påstår han er tempelridder og bedriver ett korstog for kristne verdier som de fleste ville oppfatte som høyre ekstreme og nazistiske. Han var også medlem i frimurelosjen som er kontrollert av jesuittene.) men også fordi jesuittene har skapt kommunismen, nazismen, fascismen. De er satanister. De bruker zionister, og de er ansvarlig for flere drap enn noen andre grupper i moderne tid, f.eks Holocaust under siste verdenskrig:

http://one-evil.org/acts_holocaust/acts_vatican_holocaust.htm

Jesuittene ønsker verdensherredømme. De har arbeidet målbevisst siden 1536 med å erobre hele verden for den romersk katolske kirke. De vil ha makten tilbake som de mistet under reformasjonene og de er villige til å bruke alle midler for å nå målet, dvs en verden, med en pave på toppen, som kontrollerer livene, tankene og handlingene til absolutt alle mennesker, ned i de minste detaljer, mao New World Order. Hvis en ikke ønsker å være med på dette så har en i jesuittenes øyne ingen verdi. En er ikke ett menneske. En er ett verdiløt dyr som en kan drepe. Stiller en seg i veien for jesuittene blir en også som regel drept.

http://www.seawaves.us/na/web4/extreme.html

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/vatican/esp_vatican09.htm

Det er også derfor jesuittene aldri blir nevnt når en begynner å snakke om hvem som står bak NWO. De er på en måte en mafia, som de også har opprettet. Alle i mafiaen er katolikker. Narkotikahandelen er ett forsøk på å ødelegge protestantiske land, der narkotikabruk skal gjøre det lettere å overta kotroll over protestantiske samfunn.

“Council of Trent” er grunnlaget for motreformasjonen. Det en fordømmelse av trosgrunnlaget til reformasjonen, og er fremdeles gyldig.

…fra intervju med Jon Eric Phelps:

http://www.whale.to/b/pope.html

“In the 4th Session, which is probably the most important Session, the Jesuits condemn freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom of conscience. So, no man has the right to choose his own religion; no man has the right to publish what he feels is the truth; and no man has the right to freedom of conscience.”

I “Council of Trent” har en også grunnlaget for kommunisme, Sions vises protokoller, kommunistiske sionister og NWO.

I ett annet intervju med Phelps kan en lese om hvordan jesuittene har formet sionismen, og Sions vises protokoller:

http://www.illuminati-news.com/black-pope2.htm

Martin: I would like to concentrate this conversation largely on the present day. But, before we get to the present, I would ask you to, once and for all, clarify something for our readers who may be still confused about The Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion.

There have been many sources and many reciting’s of The Protocols. They’ve been called a fraud. They’ve been called a forgery, which means that there was a document that preceded it that it had to be based on. Everyone seems to point to the Jews, or the Khazars, as the authors of The Protocols, and yet your research indicates otherwise.

Who, in your opinion, authored The Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion?

Phelps: Cardinal Bea was the confessor of Pope Pius XII (Hitler’s Pope), a very powerful Jesuit and Cardinal within the Vatican. According to Alberto Rivera, when speaking with Cardinal Bea, Cardinal Bea said to him that The Protocols were written by Jews loyal to the Pope.

I do not believe Jews wrote The Protocols. I do not believe Alberto Rivera was told the whole story, because he did not have a “need to know”. Withholding information has always been standard procedure for the Jesuits.

I believe men who were loyal to the Pope wrote The Protocols, and the men who were loyal to the Pope who wrote The Protocols were the Jesuits, according to Leo Lehmann—the ex-Irish Catholic priest who became converted to Christ and set-up the mission there in New York City, Converted Catholics For Christ. He said that the Jesuits wrote The Protocols, and that this is no new attempt of deception, based on their document that they wrote concerning their attack on the Jansenists, which was called The Secrets Of The Elders Of Bourg-Fontaine.

So, the Jesuits wrote The Protocols like they wrote The Secrets Of The Elders Of Bourg-Fontaine, and the language of The Protocols is identical to The Secret Meeting At Cheiri [1825].

…

“These Protocols of supposedly Jewish leaders are not the first documents of their kind fabricated by the Jesuits.

“For over a hundred years before these Protocols appeared, the Jesuits had continued to make use of a similar fraud called The Secrets Of The Elders Of Bourg-Fontaine against Jansenism—an anti-Jesuit French Catholic movement among the secular clergy.”

Phelps: I might also add that the Jansenists were what we would call, really, Catholic Calvinists. They believed in the sovereignty of God. They believed in justification by faith. They believed in many Biblical doctrines, and therefore the Jesuits hated them and later got the Pope to issue a Bull against them.

The Jesuits so hated the Jansenists, of which Blaise Pascal was one, that they concocted this document, The Secrets Of The Elders Of Bourg-Fontaine, against them.

Martin: What year was this?

Phelps: This was in the 1600s, I believe, in France. It may have been the late 1600s, because Blaise Pascal wrote his Provincial Letters in the later 1600s.

…

“The analogy between the two forgeries is perfect—the secret assemblage in the forest of Bourg-Fontaine; the plan of the ‘conspirators’ to destroy the Papacy and establish religious tolerance among all nations; the alleged plot against Throne and Altar, and the setting up of a world-government in opposition to the Catholic Church. There is the same dramatization of the negative pole of the historic evolution of the world, in order to bring out, by contrast, the positive Christian [Catholic] pole, around which all conservative forces—the monarchy, the aristocracy, the army, the clergy—must gather to save the world from Satan’s onslaught.”

Phelps: Is this not identical to The Protocols? Except in The Protocols, it’s Communism. Both documents want a world government, under someone other than the Pope. So, it betrays the Jesuit hand throughout, in The Protocols, based upon The Secrets Of The Elders Of Bourge-Fontaine; and furthermore, after this document, The Secrets Of the Elders of Bourge-Fontaine, the next major document that we have is Leone’s The Jesuit Conspiracy—The Secret Plan Of The Order, which was published in 1848.

In this document, Jesuit Leone was 19 years old and a novitiate in Cheiri, Italy, where he, when he was snooping around in a back room, became trapped when Jesuit General Roothaan and his provincials came in another room and he listened to this conversation between the General and his provincials—in the mid-1830s, around 1834—and while he was hiding, he was taking notes.

They betray that the Jesuit General was intent upon setting-up a World Government by controlling the Roman Catholic hierarchy, the Pope, all the monarchies, and thus all the governments of the world. And that is in Leone’s great work, The Jesuit Conspiracy, published in 1848.

It was published in several languages. It went all throughout Europe, which contributed to the people rising-up against the power of the Jesuits in 1848, with the Second French Revolution. But that revolution was controlled, the leadership of it was controlled, and the end result was more power for the Jesuit Order in Europe.

…

Phelps: The Council of Trent puts heretics—which us Bible-believers are, all Protestants and all Jews—puts all of us under more than 100 curses because of what we believe:

We believe in justification by faith.

“Accursed be all who believe in justification by faith.”

We believe that Baptism is simply an outward sign of salvation, and that it is not necessary for salvation.

“Accursed be all those who believe that.”

We believe that, when we eat of the Lord’s supper, the bread and the wine are NOT the literal body and blood of Christ, as the Council of Trent teaches, therefore we are accursed because we do not believe in transubstantiation.

And we also believe that man has a right to his own judgment. He has a right to read the Bible and make his own decisions as to what it means; that the Bible should be in the language of the people, because this the foundation of freedom of conscience, freedom of speech, and freedom of the press.

All of these things in the 4th session of the Council of Trent are condemned, anybody who believes in: freedom of speech, and freedom of conscience, and freedom of the press.

So, those maxims of the Council of Trent are brought into The Protocols when The Protocols condemn freedom of conscience; they condemn freedom of the press; they condemn national governments and national sovereignty.

———————-

Her kan en lese om hvorfor det er viktig for jesuittene og samarbeide med sionister:

http://www.whale.to/b/pope.html

Phelps: Alan Greenspan is a Jew, probably a Freemason, because he is the leader of the Temple called the ‘Federal Reserve Bank’ and they always put Jews in the forefront-so that they can blame all of what they do on the Jewish race in this country, to create an anti-Semitism everywhere, just like Charles Coughlin, the radio Jesuit priest of the ’30s did.

Greenspan, Bloomenthal, Warburg, and all those Jews need to be publicly rebuked, because they are creating the mass genocide of the Jewish race in the United States. The Jews are being blamed right now for the foreign policy in Bosnia. Madeline Albright-she’s a Jew-they’re blaming her for what’s going on in Serbia. I’ve got a good Serbian friend who blames her. I said she’s just a pawn of the Jesuit CFR. Don’t blame the Jewish people. It’s these Jewish ‘pawns’ who are loyal to the Pope and the Jesuits who are doing this.

The Zionists-the Jesuits are the Great Zionists. They control all of the historical High Zionists-Theodor Herzl, David Ben-Gurion, Golda Meir. Zionism is a Masonic term, coined by the Jesuits. They are the rulers; they are the Protocols; they are the Elders of Zion. So the Zionists are, indeed, evil and wicked; but they are controlled by Rome. The Jews are not all Zionists.

I remember when I went to Jerusalem and Israel in 1976, and a lady said to this particular man that I had met: ‘You’re more of a Zionist than we are!’ And I thought: ‘What does that mean? I don’t understand that.’

I only later understood why Yasser Arafat says he doesn’t hate the Jews; he can’t stand the Zionists. And I’m thinking: ‘What’s the difference?’ I, later, learned that there is a great difference between those Zionists and the other Jews. The Orthodox Jews can’t stand the Zionists.

So what’s the difference? The Zionists are socialist communists, controlled by Rome. They are atheists, just like the Jesuits, although they’re being used to rebuild the nation of Israel. They are the enemies of the Jewish people, per se.

There’s no conflict going on in the Middle East. There’s no conflict going on with the Arab nations. All of the Arab nations are under the command of Masonic kings or iotollas. Saddam Hussein is no enemy of George Bush; they’re both brothers, brothers of the lodge. That whole thing was set up to kill off a whole bunch of Arabs for the protection of the Zionist state of Israel.

————

Sammenheng mellom kommunisme og jesuitter:

http://www.whale.to/b/pope.html

Phelps: Let’s, first of all, look at the relationship of Jesuitism to Communism. The Jesuits perfected the tenets of Communism on their reductions in Paraguay, for 150 years, from 1600-1750.

Martin: What is a reduction?

Phelps: A reduction is a commune. In Israel they would call it a kibbutz. In Joseph Stalin’s Russia they would call it a commune. In New York they call it a village. In France, Paris, they called it a commune. It’s communal living where everybody is equal in their finances, in the labors; you have no great, no small, no rich, no poor-everybody is small, and everybody is poor, and everybody is controlled by a dictator. That’s the essence of Communism.

The Jesuits, on the reductions in Paraguay, which were the communes, had a central bank, and it was ‘each according to their ability and each according to their need’. And so, the Guarani Indians that were the subjects-and there were some 200,000 of these South American Indian natives who were slaves of the Jesuits, putting their goods into world commerce and trade. They were living under the tenets of Communism, perfected by the Jesuits, as outlined in Plato’s Republic and Sir Thomas Moore’s Utopia. The Jesuits perfected it on their reductions.

With that,

they then introduced Communism in 1848 through Karl Marx. They tutored him in the British Museum, according to Alberto Rivera, an ex-Jesuit.

So Marx, the Jewish Freemason, was to be the one to put forward this Communism for the world, so that Communism would look like a Jewish brain-child, so that Communism could be blamed on the Jews. Well, what’s not told is that the Jews involved in the implementing of Communism were Masonic Jews. Karl Marx was a 33rd-degree Freemason, a worshipper of Lucifer, whose father wanted nothing to do with him, because his father was a Baptist preacher.

Jewish Freemasonry, controlled by the Jesuits, implemented Communism in Russia. Lenin, the half-Jew, was a Freemason. That civil war that took place from 1917-1922, for 5 years, was given the appearance that it was primarily Yiddish. I mean, they’re on the streets of Russia talking Yiddish; they had Yiddish signs; and it was wanted to give the impression to the world that this revolution was of Jewish origin.

For 10 years after the revolution, the Jews faired very well, but in 1922, Joseph Stalin, that great Jew-hater, who was educated by Jesuits in Georgia-which was a country south of Russia and, therefore, the Emperor’s banning of the Jesuits from Russia, his Ukase, did not reach to Georgia. So the Jesuits stayed in Georgia, trained Joseph Stalin, brought him in after the Revolution, and made him Secretary of the Communist Party in 1922, until he died in 1953.

The Jesuits used Freemasonry and, of course, Stalin was also a brother Freemason. They used Freemasonry to implement Communism in Russia, and from there, China, and from there, throughout the world.

Han forteller også hvorfor og hvordan Jesuittene innførte kommunisme i Kina, Vietnam, Øst-Asia og Cuba. (Med god hjelp av zionister og jøder selvfølgelig.

—————–

Jesuittene kontrollerer den katolske kirke.

Eric Jon Phelps:

Martin: Now, those who see the current Pope see a very frail man. Has he served well? Is that why he’s been allowed to stay on so long?

Phelps: He’s done very well. He’s served the Jesuit Order perfectly. This supposed rift between him and Arrupe, and suppressing the Jesuits with their Liberation Theology in Central America, is all for public consumption. That Pope is completely emasculated with regard to the power of the Jesuit Order.

The Jesuit Order has proven its power with the Napoleonic Wars, the killing of Pope Pius VI, the imprisoning of Pius VII, the restoration by Pius VII.

THE JESUIT ORDER IS OMNIPOTENT WHEN IT COMES TO THE PAPACY, AND THEY ARE THE ONES IN POWER.

Just like Hitler fashioned his Third Reich around the Papacy, the Secret Police or the SS were modeled after the Jesuits, and the Jesuits are the Secret Police of the Vatican Empire. They keep things in order. Without the Jesuit Order, the Vatican and the Papacy and the hierarchy would fall apart.

http://www.illuminati-news.com/black-pope2.htm

De kontrollerer dermed verdens største organisasjon og da jesuittene ble etablert i 1536 fikk de kontroll over verdens største økonomi. Det er fullstendig usannsynelig at zionistene skulle kunne opparbeide seg mer politisk og økonomisk makt enn jesuittene.

Når skal egentlig dem som misliker tyrraniet begynne å fokusere på Jesuitter? Det er praktisk talt ingen som gjør det, men det er selvfølgelig mye mer bekvemmelig å gå til angrep på sionister, sosialister og kommunister, siden en da slipper å få problemer med mafiaen.

Nå begynner maktgrunnlaget til jesuittene å rakne, slik det også har skjedd før. De innfører for mye tyrrani, i for høyt tempo, og resultatet er at folk gjør opprør. Skal de lykkes så må tyrraniet innføres så gradvis at befolkningen ikke legger merke til det. Tankekontrollen, tvangsbehandlingen, programmeringen av befolkningen må foregå på en slik måte at den enkelte ikke oppdager hva som foregår, og det prosjektet klarer de ganske enkelt ikke å gjennomføre. De har ikke klart det før og de har ikke klart det nå heller.

Det eneste måten de kan få ett overtak på er å bruke biologiske våpen, slippe ut virus og bakterier, slik at mesteparten av verdens befolkning dør, og jeg tror ikke de klarer det heller, men det får være en annen historie til ett annet innlegg. Det her begynner å bli for langt allerede.