Is the location of the statues of Franklin D. Roosevelt and George Marshall in Oslo based on myths, illusions and forty or for openness and factual?
The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie, Deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive and unrealistic.
John F. Kennedy
On Kontraskjæret heart of Oslo, the Oslo City Hall and Akershus Fortress are the two statues of Uncle Sam on what must be described as a place of honor. These are former U.S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt ( "FDR") and former U.S. defense chief and Secretary of State George Catlett Marshall.
What is the background for such a placement of the statues of two strange foreigners? Have any of them at all deserve to have statues erected in our Norwegian soil? Based on myths, illusions and forty or for openness and factual?
Norway, which has been called America's 51 state and U.S. lydigste poodle, has been his solid dose of myths about Uncle Sam's efforts during World War II, symbolized by the war president FDR.
Norwegian politicians, military and journalists, even academics type historians, seems to be Duper of myths far down in the subconscious of what FDR actually committed before and during the war.
Roosevelt sat as President for more than 3 periods in the years 1933-1945. Both during the Great Depression that the war was the great need for leading figures in the Western world, and FDR filled in many ways the role of "lighthouse" and "leader of the free world".
The United States had come furthest in adopting radio as mass medium, and FDRs "Fireside chats" where he sat next to a crackling peisild in the White House and as an uncle-sjonkel spoke to the people of his sheltered way went straight home in the heart of the roots with most people. Another part of the FDR myth is that his Communist-inspired planned economy, the "New Deal" helped pull the U.S. out of economic depression in the wake of the collapse 4 years before.
In the Norwegian collective subconscious sounds myth of FDR something like this:
"Because of America's efforts during the war and the Marshall Aid after the war owe Norway USA eternal gratitude, obedience and subservience. About Norwegian politicians would find to criticize such. military use or other forms of immoral behavior committed by the United States will be be illojalt and ungrateful towards Norway's leading allies. Hallelujah and amen. "
Behind the myth of FDR is that a number of not so positive facts about the Freemasons, the President, Navy Minister and power man FDR. News Diary takes her for some of the facts that have avoided Norwegian historians, politicians and journalists their searchlights in strikingly large extent.
In 1921, FDR was stricken by polio and paralyzed from the waist down. The fact that he was able to hold this major handicap hidden for so many years has been called "a splendid deception." (FDR was basically in a wheelchair, but he had mounted the iron rails of bones that made that he was able to stand for short periods, for example. during shooting)
The president was invalid ...
... was not something people need to know
When FDR was hit by heart attack in May 1944 told the doctors that he could not work more than 4 hours a day if he wanted to avoid dying.
This was in the critical months before the Normandy invasion. Without having already made his highly weakened state of health was FDR in November 1944 the new elected president.
This year, he spent a total of 200 days outside the White House for health reasons. FDR died of a brain hemorrhage in April 1945, three months into his final term.
As Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Assistant Secretary of the Navy) FDR personally led a force of U.S. Marines who invaded and occupied the independent Republic of Haiti in 1915. FDR then ruled Haiti cruelly and without respect for human life, as a kind of early "Baby Doc dictator" after a military invasion, the "democratization". After FDR's conduct in Haiti was beaten up as a major scandal in 1920 did President Harding affair by humble FDR public with the words:
"Practically all we know is that thousands of native Haitian have been killed by American Marines, and that many of our own gallant but have Sacrificed their lives at the behest of an executive department in the Order to establish laws drafted by the Assistant Secretary of the Navy ... I will not empower an Assistant Secretary of the Navy two draft a constitution for helpless neighbors in the West Indies and jam it down their throats at the point of bayonets borne by U.S. Marines. "
At Yalta FDR agreed in that 2 million Soviet citizens who found themselves outside the Soviet Union at war's end, mainly prisoners of war from the Red Army, was transported back to Russia, knowing that they would be executed on the orders of Stalin, which also happened.
This meant a serious violation of the Geneva Convention's provisions on the treatment of prisoners of war, and is described among others Operation Keelhaul by Julius Epstein, The secret betrayal of N. Tolstoy and The Last Secret of N. Bethall.
As Assistant Secretary of the Navy approved the FDR use of traps to expose homosexuals in the Navy, including at that young recruits were commanded to perform homosexual acts. When this matter was turned up as a great scandal FDR lied under oath in court about his involvement, including by claiming that he had not known what order he had signed had expired.
When General MacArthur was informed of FDRs death in 1945 was his laconic comment:
"Well, the old man has gone, a man who never told the truth when a lie would suffice."
FDR himself said about his lack of honesty in a few years before he died:
"You know I am a juggler, and I never let my right hand know what my left hand does. I'm perfectly willing to mislead and tell untruths ... "
( "FDR A Biography" by Ted Morgan p. 550)
On one occasion boasted of FDR that he had "committed NOK illegal acts" to be impeached and sentenced to 999 years in prison.
(Blanche Cook - Eleanor Roosevelt, vol 1, 1992, p. 265 to 266)
In April 1933, months after FDR had been president for the first time, he issued a decree (Presidential Executive Order 6102) as under threat in 10 years' imprisonment forced all U.S. citizens to give up their privately held gold for a price of 20, $ 67 per ounce. The recipient of the gold was the privately owned Federal Reserve System ( "The Fed"), a privately owned institution that was and is disguised as a central bank and owned by European and U.S. banks and financial establishments.
After the gold-withdrawal had been completed was the price of gold increased to $ 35 overnight.
Under the pretext of having to fight the contemporary financial crisis and economic depression, FDR implemented a bid communist-like planned economy under the name of the New Deal, which innebær a very high degree of state intervention and the dictation of the economy and to citizens' lives. FDRs close advisor Douglas said about the New Deal idea: "The present pseudo-planned economy leads relentlessly into the complete autocracy and tyranny of the Collectivist State."
One of FDRs supporters, Merle Thorpe, stated in 1935 that the FDRs regime had implemented most of the points in the Communist Manifesto:
"We have given legislative status, either in whole or in part, to eight of the ten points of the Communist Manifesto of 1848, and, as some point out, done (sic) a better job of implementation than Russia."
New Deal policies were in effect the opposite of what FDR had promised. FDR had promised to reduce government expenditure by 25% and to avoid budget deficits, but in the period 1933 to 1936 increased government expenditure by 83%.
A good analysis of the New Deal is Al Smith's speech "The facts in the case" (case facts), which was held in January 1936. See http://www.geocities.com/mark_willey/smith36.pdf
About the results of the New Deal said Winston Churchill in 1937:
"The Washington administration has waged so ruthless a war on private enterprise that the U.S. ... is actually ... leading the world back into the trough of depression."
In 1935 it introduced a new design on the dollar bills. At the 1-dollar bills were placed a pyramid with an eye on the top, along with the text NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM, year 1776 (the year of the founding of the modern Illuminati) and other symbolism that certainly had its source in the U.S. Constitution.
Today's 1 dollar decoration was introduced by FDR
It was Henry Wallace, Freemason of 32 degree and vice president under FDR in 1940-1944 who had suggested that the Illuminati symbol should adorn U.S. coins.
FDR decided that the pyramid-motif instead should be placed on the 1-dollar bill. Later it became known that this symbol is the secret Brotherhood Illuminati its logo. Illuminati represents the top of most of the world's power-pyramids (sic), including the Masonic hierarchy, a fact most of the Masons of lower degrees are happily ignorant of.
FDR was a Freemason of 32 degree, the second-highest official level. FDR was also a member of a secret society called the Ancient Arabic Order of Nobles of the Mystics Shrine (Shrines), in which he reached the rank of Knight of Pythia. This order stated that it was part of the satanistiske Illuminati. Masons Walter Flemming and William Florence founded the American branch in 1872. Only Masons who had reached 32 degree in the Scottish Rite to become a member.
Furthermore, the FDR of the Illuminati-controlled Time magazine named the "first runner-up to the title of Man of the 20th Century, only beaten by Albert Einstein.
Illuminati are masters of illusion art. Language symbols and in-depth insight into the human subconscious is the key words to understand this. Creation myth and myth conservation are words. important tool that the Illuminati use to brain wash the masses and the "blind them from seeing obvious truths". What is a statue? Not just a shape designed in stone or bronze, a statue is a symbol - as perceived and interpreted by the subconscious, where myths and illusions help to override the logical thinking, and sometimes even common sense ...
In 1935 the U.S. Supreme Court declared unanimously that the main element of the New Deal, FDRs
Communist-inspired National Recovery Administration (NRA - popularly known as "Nuts Running America") was unconstitutional.
During the war, FDR sent troops to occupy Greenland, Iceland and the Canary Islands in violation of the Constitution (See "President Roosevelt and The Coming of War 1941" by Charles Beard)
FDR used the IRS (Internal Revenue Service - IRS) to spy on his political opponents, including Father Coughlin, Hamilton Fish, editor Moe Annenberg in The Philadelphia Inquirer and Charles Lindbergh.
FDR also obtained FBI files on his political opponents and "invented" illegal phones that he also practiced - of course, illegal.
Already in 1912, FDR held a speech (in Troy, New York), where he gave an account of his philosophy, including by placing the "liberty of the community" over "the liberty of the individual."
In 1934, Louis Howe, FDR quoted to have said that "the time has arrived to build a new kind of government founded on the doctrine of the good neighbor and not the cruel doctrine of 'rugged individualism." "FDR articulated words. for a ruthless and all-powerful state at the expense of concern for the individual.
FDR refused to save 900 Jews who had fled Nazi Germany in May 1939 aboard the ship St. Louis. When the ship was off the coast of Florida gave FDR ordered the passengers should be refused to go ashore in the United States. (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MS_St._Louis)
Jewish boat refugees aboard the MS St. Louis, who had succeeded in their escape from Nazi Germany but was betrayed by FDR off the coast of the United States
The ship's voyage is depicted in the film "Voyage of the Damned" from 1976. It goes with the story that the ship's captain, Gustav Schroeder, a German anti-Nazi, refused to bring the ship back to Germany with Jewish passengers on board.
Captain Schröder is otherwise honored as one of the "righteous among nations" at the Holocaust Museum Yad Vashem in Israel - for their heroic efforts to rescue Jews aboard the St. Louis.
FDR prevented that information about the ongoing Holocaust in Europe was published in the U.S. (according to the Treasury Report).
FDR refused to bomb the railway lines that led to Hitler's concentration camps and crematoria, and other infrastructure in the Nazi death camps. This could have saved hundreds of thousands of people who were killed in the camps.
(David Wyman - Abandonment of the Jews, 1984, p 295).
Treasury Department said January 13, 1944 that FDR was "guilty not only of gross procrastination and willful failure to act, but even of willful attempts to prevent action from being taken two rescue Jews from Hitler."
It is determined by a number of independent researchers that FDR in 1941 wanted the United States would join the war. In order to get a pretext was provoked Japan to attack the U.S. Pacific fleet. Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor took place on 7 December 1941. 2403 people died and 1178 people were wounded, and the United States declared war on Japan the next day.
The truth about the attack on Pearl Harbor and the prelude to this include described in:
"Roosevelt and the First Shot: A Study of Deceit and Deception" by John Denson
"Infamy" by John Toland
"Pearl Harbor: The Facts Behind the Fiction." The New American, Vol 17, No. 12, June 4, 2001
"Pearl Harbor: Mother of All Conspiracies" by Mark Willey
"Day of Deceit: The Truth about FDR and Pearl Harbor" by Robert Stinnett
"Sacrifice at Pearl Harbor" film by BBC Warner
At the same time that FDR rigged in the scenes in order to provoke a war with Japan for the United States to join the war, he assured the American people that a war aaaaldri would get in touch:
"While I am talking to you mothers and fathers, I give you one more assurance. I have said this before, and I shall say it again and again and again: Your boys are not going to be sent into any foreign wars. "
After it became known that FDR was the driving force behind the Pearl Harbor attack considered this as one of history's worst cases of hypocrisy.
Pearl Harbor attack was a Palis-operation ( "Provoke an Attack and Let It Succeed"), which means that the authorities in a country provoke an attack against itself and let the attack be gjennomførrt without seeming to have been prepared so that their own forces suffer significant losses.
During the war went on an extensive supply of weapons, technology, commodities and information from the U.S. to Stalin's Soviet Union. This was made possible by the so-called Lend-Lease Act, which FDR had trump through the Congress in March 1941, a time when neither the Soviet Union or the United States was at war.
The extensive shipments to the Soviet Union under the Lend-Lease program, and not least "no questions asked" kind from the U.S. side when it came to meet Russian wishes, attracted the attention of Major George Racey Jordan, who worked at the Newark airport in New Jersey under War. Gradually he became interested in some top-secret "diplomatic suitcases" that his instincts from time to time drove him to open. It turned out that nuclear technology in the form of thorium, uranium and technological information were among the items that FDR so graciously shared with the Soviet dictator Stalin.
FDR gave to the Soviet Union at least 700 kilograms of uranium (approximately 4 times as much fisjonerbar U-235 as the United States even kept), 417 tons of cadmium, 437 tons of cobalt, 12 tons of thorium and 1,100 ounces of heavy water and the necessary equipment for the atomic bomb and a reactor to produce plutonium. A complete overview of the contents of FDRs helping hand to Stalin can be found here: http://www.geocities.com/mark_willey/lend.html
Major Jordan kept a diary, and "From Major Jordan's diaries" came as a book in 1952. Det oppsiktsvekkende innholdet av FDRs enorme gaver til Stalin har i mange år vært undertrykt av myndigheter og mainstream media. Major Jordans Diaries er nå tilgjengelig på nettet her: http://arcticbeacon.com/books/Maj_Geo_Racey_Jordan-FROM_MAJOR_JORDANS_DIARIES.pdf
For øvrig fant det sted en høring etter at FDR var død og krigen var over om FDRs hemmelige overføringer av atomteknologi til Stalins Sovjet; The US House of Representatives, Eighty-first Congress, Second Session, Committee on Un-American Activities, Hearings Regarding Shipment of Atomic Material to the Soviet Union During World War II.
På Jalta samtykket FDR velvillig i at landene Polen, Ungarn, Tsjekkoslovakia, Bulgaria og de øvrige landene som ble innesperret bak jernteppet ble kontrollert av Stalins Sovjet. FDR ofret hundrevis av millioner mennesker til å leve i den kommunistiske misére uten å prøve å løfte en eneste finger, uten å ytre en eneste setning, for å prøve å forhindre det.
Jalta-møtet i februar 1945: Stalins lydigste puddel FDR i ferd med å begå historiens største svik mot den frie verden og å samtykke i massemord på hundretusener av krigsfanger fra Den Røde Armé.
At FDR etter dette historiske sviket fikk beholde sin mytiske tittel som ”den frie verdens fyrtårn” er noe nær en absurd illusjon, og mildt sagt en gåte. Landene i Øst-Europa som ble ofret til Stalin hadde vært akkurat like frie før krigen kom som landene i Vest-Europa.
I september 1943 hadde FDR en samtale med sin venn Vatikanets kardinal Spellman. Her forklarte FDR hvordan han ville dele opp Europa etter krigen:
"Stalin would certainly receive Finland, the Baltic states, the eastern half of Poland and Bessarabia (Romania) ... Britain and Russia get Europe and Africa. But as Britain has predominating colonial interests, it might be assumed that Russia will predominate in Europe ... The European people, which includes France, Belgium, Holland, Denmark, and Norway and of course our wartime enemies Germany and Italy, will simply have to endure the Russian domination in the hope that in ten or twenty years they will be comfortable to live with the Russians. "
(See "The Cardinal Spellman Story by Robert Gannon s 222-24)
After the Yalta Conference, FDR said to Averill Harriman that he did not care about the countries bordering the Soviet Union ended up as a Communist.
One of FDRs most famous quotes reads:
"In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way. "
Mao. should it be assumed, that the FDRs actions described in paragraphs 1-17 happened exactly, because someone wanted it that way. Some can be interpreted in this context that THEY - FDRs parent puppet masters in the Illuminati.
"Look to Norway" is a term from a speech by FDR, which was held in September 1942. The main content reads:
"If there is anyone who still wonders why this war is being fought, let him look to Norway.
If there is anyone who has any delusions that this war could have been averted, let him look to Norway;
and if there is anyone who doubts the democratic will to win, again I say, let him look to Norway. "
FDR insisted Norway and the Norwegian people's democratic spirit, as an example of inspiration.
This implies both that a statue of a respectable Norwegian with democratic mind should have been given to the nation the United States as an example of inspiration and emulate. What logic is there in that it was the opposite happened - that a statue of the undemocratic and deceitful power-monster FDR appeared in the middle of Norway, where it resides today?!
Strictly speaking, should be a statue of Josef Stalin or the Red Army's Marshall Shukhov have been raised on Kontraskjæret, if the purpose of election of the statue was to honor the most important contributor to the defeated by Nazi Germany and the liberation of Norway in 1945.
At the foot of the Marshall statue that was erected in 2008, it says "Erected by the grateful Norwegians". 60 years after the Marshall Aid, it is claimed that the Norwegians are still "grateful" to the long deceased Marshall. As if the dear Marshall was browsing the help that bore his name from his own wallet.
The text of the Marshall statue in Oslo: Myth-maintenance anno 2008.
During the unveiling of the Marshall statue 15 June 2008 contributed Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Støre to the myth-the maintenance of such to say that:
"As Chief of Staff of the U.S. armed forces from 1939 Thurs 1945 George C. Marshall was one of the main architects of the allied victory in the Second World War." (See: http://www.norway.org/policy/ news / Marshall.htm)
11 of 10 independent war historians will probably argue that Russian Marshall Shukhov and the Red Army contributed significantly more to Nazi Germany's defeat than George Marshall.
Soviet war hero who shone over even Stalin: Marshall Georgi Shukhov
War-strategic, it was not very smart ... ... to arrive in Normandy by sea long after U.S. forces had bitten him firmly on the mainland of northern Italy. Normandy - "far away from Stalin" - was selected as the landing point because it is not disturbed Stalin's plans in the eastern and central Europe. George Marshall reasoned choice of Normandy so against the British: "It would be 'more satisfying to the Russians'." In Normandy-year 1944, Churchill out and complained publicly that the United States treated as worse than the Soviet ally. Churchill has pointed out that the Normandy invasion was the only option to lose the war.
How can the dear Støre, going to be one of the most enlightened politicians in today's Norway, talk to the degrees to better knowledge, after having studied both the history of political science in France?
Jonas Gahr Støre and Walter Mondale. Showing the picture one or two Illuminati puppets?
A logical, but surprising explanation, is that large is an Illuminati puppet. Perhaps it is Illuminati puppet and former Vice President Walter ( "Naëma kozelig so that you have Norwegian ancestors") Mondale is Stoere's mentor in the hidden power circles. It is certainly a fact that Støre visited Mondale in the U.S. just before the NATO meeting in Romania in spring 2008. To receive secret instructions from their puppet masters ...?
Norway received about 460 million U.S. dollars in the Marshall aid in the years after 1947.
There is a popular expression that says "You shall not accept anything - because it is not free". Before the war, Norway had been a poor but free, proud and independent country, as such noted in FDRs "Look to Norway" statements.
Why was it not considered whether Norway should receive Marshall "help" as a loan on commercial terms, with interest and principal that may be operated until the loan was paid back? Would not this have been a fair price to keep Norway's self-respect? Norway was, after all, not in ruins, as is the case for example. was with Germany.
The question of how Marshall Aid was funded should also have been a natural element in the assessment prior to "help" was decided received. Before the U.S. joined the war, the U.S. national debt amounted to 49 billion dollars. When the war was over the debt had risen to 258 billion.
How did the United States to provide money to think - how the "aid" funded? Join assistance funds borrowed in the commercial banks while the U.S. government itself commissioned the payment of interest and repayment, with the tax money collected from U.S. citizens at that time had more than NOK with him and his? Or they were allocated directly over the U.S. government budget, which was made up with a huge deficit?
Why did Norwegian politicians then, as now behave like a beggar boys who throw themselves over a few silver pieces that are thrown to them by a seemingly wealthy, but in reality deeply indebted uncle? A beggar attitude that was expressed as the Støre in 2008:
"We are talking about an assistance program of up to then unknown dimensions. For Norway this meant, among other things, an opportunity to prioritize industry rebellion. To think long term. For the average American could not it be obvious that the U.S. would use the new billions of dollars in Europe. "
Industry Rising using the "gifts" with many strings attached. What kind of attitude is that? The attitude of Norway as the United States forever obedient poodle. What if Norway had taken out loans and entered into strategic partnerships with commercial partners, as Norway had developed economically before the war? And what about the fact that a large part of the Marshall Aid was just - a loan? Marshall Aid was not free, rather a high price to condemn themselves to lasting gratitude and submission.
Strictly speaking, you should probably Marshall Aid paid back in full and with interest. Not as a "gift" to the terrible indebted Uncle Sam anno 2009, but as a reasonable price for that Norway finally can get back their independence and self-respect as a country and people by cutting the ties, and finally be free from Uncle Sam-complex. What role does the well of the amount will constitute 3 or 5 billion dollars in today's currency? It will not even notice if it decided that the Petroleum Fund will make this refund as a redemption of debt that is long overdue.
Neither Marshall's Column text or any of the many speakers during the ritual unveiling statue named authors and sponsors, as is natural would have been. A bit strange is that the.
The fact is that the initiator and sponsor of the statue of the Nobel Peace Prize winner Marshall was the Atlantic Committee, which is something of a superstructure or a underbruk of NATO. A NATO that appears to be less and less peace-loving and the more focused on good old fashioned war in the form of invasion and occupation.
Atlantic Committee home pages contains information for students about why it is necessary that NATO, the U.S. and Norway, have to conduct a year-long war in the not quite Atlantic Afghanistan.
The information "Afghanistan Package - an educational resource" is the myth-creating propaganda for schoolchildren (see: http://www.atlanterhavskomiteen.no/afghanistan). The introduction of the propaganda lie to the smallest sounds:
"11 September 2001 suicide terrorists hijacked four airliners and crashed them into important buildings in the United States. Actions were planned by people who hid in Afghanistan ... "
Myth Creation of a new generation. From the Atlantic Committee's website.
Notice how cleverly hypocritical symbolism is woven into the text of the Marshall statue. Words such as "Prize Winner" and "grateful Norwegians" is used as a platform to indoctrinate a new generation of Norwegians with Uncle Sam-myth. Myth that Norway is committed to support Uncle Sam's criminal military operations completely beyond Norway's own security needs (Afghanistan was ever a military threat to Norway ...?) communicated as a matter of course.
Atlantic Committee hypocritical intentions in the form of "occupation called democracy" was clearly articulated by the Assistant Deputy Secretary of State in the Clinton government and a researcher at The Germanwings Marshall Fund of the United States and the Council of Foreign Relations, Ronald D. Asmus, in a speech in Oslo under the auspices of the Atlantic Committee in 2004.
In good company among opinion kinsmen was NATO's hypocritical silk glove made by NATO and criminal iron hand shown with pride and obvious:
"The point of Asmus is that NATO is still a very relevant organization. Not as a defensive alliance of Western territory - primarily European - but as a democratic project for the entire Middle East ... The new paradigm implies nothing less than the transformation of societies in the enlarged Middle East. "
See www.nytid.no/arkiv/artikler/20040318/en_ny_transatlantisk_masterplan
More than 1 million dead Iraqis have already experienced how the "democratization" conducted by the U.S. Armed Forces is perceived, a process taking place in Afghanistan and currently eats inwards in a Pakistan that is experiencing increasing destabilization as a result of U.S. and NATO's trigger-happy presence in the area.
If the historical facts and not well-established myths should be the criteria for who deserves space on the shelf on Norwegian soil, should be statues of FDR and Marshall removed.
To fill the void in FDRs current pavilion space on Kontraskjæret may, for example. a statue of a Norwegian place where FDR is now. This may, for example. be a Norwegian politician, like a democratic man of honor of the mold as FDR had in mind when he pronounced the words:
"... If there is anyone who doubts the democratic will to win, again I say, let him look to Norway."
That Norway was liberated from the German occupiers gave simply no guarantee that Norway would again be democratic. The Norwegian lawyer and history recognizer Synnøve Fjellbakk Taftø have argued that Norway in the period 8 May 13 December 1945 legally occupied by the allied nations, the United States and United Kingdom ( "Nornes narrative" of Synnøve Fjellbakk Taftø p. 44).
In Johan J. Jakobsen's book "The power and the glory," explains how it was committed attempted a coup against the Norwegian democracy while Norway was occupied by the Allies in 1945:
"As an active resistance fighter had Trædal known well to the bitter conflict between the Home Front leadership and the parts of the resistance movement that was critical of the management of the Home Front would put both the Parliament and the elected municipal boards to the side and establish a transitional government, without constitutional and democratic foundation."
( "The power and the glory, biography of Nils Trædal" by Johan J. Jakobsen p. 14)
It was not least thanks to the Agrarian Party chairman Nils Trædal and his political allies untiring effort to salvage the Norwegian democracy after the war ended that the Parliament's power and the Norwegian democracy was rescued in 1945 and through the critical years that followed.
Nils Trædal - a Norwegian politician with backbone. This statue is located in Sunndal municipality.
Will, courage, principled and a good portion of traditional Norwegian integrity were important characteristics of Norway's greatest politician Trædal. Politician and author Johan J. Jakobsen said about Trædal: "Trædal democratic spirit and sense of justice is that red thread through his life." ( "The power and the glory," p. 20)
For biografisk info om Nils Trædal, se f.eks. http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/om_regjeringen/tidligere/oversikt/departementer_embeter/embeter/statsminister-1814-/nils-tradal.html?id=463386
Trædals vilje til å kjempe for det han hadde kjært kom til uttrykk i hans minnetale over Tsjekkoslovakias utenriksminister Jan Masaryk våren 1948, som var blitt accidented (dvs. drept på en måte som var kamuflert som ulykke) i et fall ut av sitt kontorvindu i Praha. Trædal sa dette om drapet på Masaryk: ”Slike hendingar fortel vel utan ord meir enn noko anna kva det stundom kostar å gå inn for det ein er overtydd om !”
Da Stortinget kom sammen i oktober 1948 var saken som trolig engasjerte Trædal mest den såkalte ”Hvitboken” til undersøkelseskommisjonen av 1945, hvis offisielle navn var ”Regjeringen og hjemmefronten under krigen”. Hvitboken inneholdt bl.a. dokumentasjon om den kontroversielle og sensitive korrespondansen mellom Hjemmefront-ledelsen og London-regjeringen under krigen.
Få dager før ”Hvitboken” skulle fremlegges og debatteres i Stortinget ble Trædal accidented ut av et vindu i bygården i Oslo hvor han bodde. Trædal falt ut av et vindu i en trappeoppgang på en måte som praktisk talt ikke hadde vært mulig uten at noen hadde ”hjulpet” ham til å falle. Som det heter på godt norsk:
I politikken skjer ingenting tilfeldig. Hvis det skjer, vær sikker på at det ble planlagt slik.
Som en kuriositet kan det nevnes at James Forrestal, som var USAs forsvarsminister da Marshall var utenriksminister (1947-49) ble accidented fra 16. etasje noen måneder etter Trædal, i mai 1949. Open window accidenting av patriotiske politikere grep om seg i årene etter krigen. Er det mulig at accidentingen og andre mafiametoder hadde sin effekt, og at dette er noe av grunnen til at norske politikere har vært så ivrige med å logre etter USA og EU og så tafatte med å knesette norske interesser i etterkrigstiden, et faktum som i 2009 er mer åpenbart enn noengang ?
Statuene av Franklin D. Roosevelt og George C. Marshall bør fjernes fra norsk jord, og erstattes av en statue av Norges store politiker Nils Trædal. En norsk politiker som utviste sann patriotisme og uredd sto for sine prinsipper da demokratiet var som mest truet, for så å miste sitt liv for Norges demokrati, fortjener virkelig sin statue i maktens by Oslo.
Hvorfor er norske politikere så happy med å ta imot almisser i enhver form fra Uncle Sam, og så fremmede for å skjenke gaver til USA, gitt mellom likemenn ?
Hva med å rette ryggen og opptre med litt ekte selvrespekt på vegne av Norge?
En ny praktstatue av Nils Trædal bør lages i to like utgaver. Den ene kan plasseres der hvor FDR-statuen nå befinner seg. Den andre kan skjenkes som en gave til USA og sendes til Washington DC for plassering på et dertil egnet sted. På denne måten behøver ikke USAs politiske ledelse ”to look all the way to Norway” for å få litt forbilledlig inspirasjon knyttet til hederlighet, prinsippfasthet, rettskaffenhet og ekte demokratisk sinnelag hos politikere.
Et Norway som etter å ha tilbakebetalt sin mottatte Marshall-hjelp med renter pluss litt til og har klart å løsrive seg fra sine myter nok til å bli i stand til å rykke opp de to Uncle Sam statuene i Oslo med sokler og symbolikk vil ha en bedre mulighet til å fungere som et fritt og selvstendig land, uten å føle hverken plikt eller trang til å underkaste seg Uncle Sam-illusjonen.
"Tell the media 
Print this article 
»RSS Feed» RSS comment feed
Hans K. Gaarder has an MBA and very interdisciplinary by inclination, "most interested in it that do not have to do with economics." As independent health researcher with physics as a basis, he came to the conclusion that there must be plenty of information about health, illness, disease prevention and healing that is kept secret by powerful forces, including information related to the biophysics and frequencies important for the body and health. In recent years been more concerned to map out and expose THEY and what the hell it is they're doing.
Contact the author | More articles by Hans Gaarder (20) | Author's web site
Loading ... 
WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.
Flott skrevet! 6 stjerners artikkel det her!
Hykleri styrer dette landet…
super artikkel.
jeg har lest at Suttons 3. bok i triliogien om NWOs sosialistiske wall street finansiering handler om finansiering av Roosvelts sosialsisme. Har ikke lest den enda, men tipper at du har.
Verdensbanken har “gitt” penger til den tredje verden lenge, fordi vi er så snille og humane. -I virkeligheten har vi bidrat til kjøp av mennesker på slavebørsen. -Og slik har det foregått hele tiden. -og slik var det etter 2. verdenskrig, som amerikanere blir kjøpt idag. Nietzsche skrev at han aldri tok imot noen gave. At han alltid var mistroisk til de som ville “gi” ham noe. -Det er på et mellommenneskelig plan. Mellom nasjoner er det likedan.
Kjempeartikkel. -Veldig viktig tema. thanks
Fantastiks artikkel. Forstyrrende å tenke på at det utdraget fra ”Afghanistanpakken – en undervisningsressurs” er kanskje det lillesøstra mi som begynner på skole om noen år kommer til å lære når hun er blitt litt eldre.
ja ja sikkert grei artikkel dette her men var jo noe alle viste fra før da…..
Men er vel en del feighet siden en ikke på siden her er noen som tørr og lage en rapotasje om Hakon Lie og Hauge som får Hitler til og fremstå som Mor Teresa i forhold til dem.
87 mann på tinget har fått hjerneslag eller alvorlig kreft på ytterste venstreside siden andre verdenskrig mot 4 på deres side…odsen for at det skulle vært telfeldigt er vel som og vinne 7 rette i lotto 4 helger på rad…Olaf Tommesen tok opp at han ikke likte at medlemmer av tinget var medlemmer i hemlige sekter og organisajoner som BBG og israels venner og poff så fikk han hjeneslag, Bastesen tok opp i spørretimen at han ikke like conectinin til BBG og hemlige organisjasjoner og poff en uke etterpå fikk han slag, Olaf palme nekta Henry kissinger visum og Poff var han borte, Max Manus regisøren tok opp at han ville lage film om Osvald Gruppen og poff fikk han kreft, Synøve Tøfte kom inn på temaet og EØS og Poff var ho borte, 37 medlemmer på tinget nå er medlemmer av Israels venner nå og hvem vil ha politikere som er mere opptatt av inbyggere fra andres land en sitt eget ? hadde sikkert blitt oppslag vist 37 medlemmer av tinget var med i nord koreas venner og var mere opptatt av dem en egne innbyggere og sånn kunne jeg fortsatt i det uendlige men ingen gidder og lese inlegg som er for for lange …..
Håkon Lie og Jens Cristian Hauge fjerna alle politiske motstandere ved hjelp av Mossad og CIA og solgte masse tungtvann til Israel sånn at dem allerede i 1970 hadde over 200 atombomber i et prosjekt dem kalla vist noen angriper oss og ødlegger vårt land så tar vi resten av verden med oss.
Israel trenger ikke mere en 5-6 atombomber for og utslette all trussel fra nabolanda .
og derfor lukker resten av verden øya for sånn som dem holder på der nede, dem er livredde kyllinger..
Dukker opp noen avogtil som tørr og kalle en spade for en spade som Terje Rød Larsen osv men poff dagen etter at han kalte en maskre på en flytningleir for en masakre så hadde han vist ikke betalt nok skatt for noen aksjer og var på alle førstesider så poff så var han borte……..
Savner redaktører som er villige til og satse livet sitt for og fortelle folk at vi vi ikke bor i en rosa boble der alle er snille mot verandre og ingen er slemme mot verandre og gjør slemme ting for egen vinnings skyld……
Ser det alltid er mye snakk om privateide Federal Reserve System. Eneste skikkelige fakta jeg finner er at det er over 5000 private banker og nesten 900 statlige banker som står på eiersiden. Men overskuddet går til Treasury. og det er vell ikke privat… Ingen aksjeutbytte heller etter hva jeg kan finne ut av? Noen som vet hvordan eiersiden er fordelt blant alle disse bankene? Naturlig er vell at de største har størst eierdel.
Nice article. Historien har en tendens til å bli fordreid til det ugjenkjennelig når det kommer til det som kalles allmennkunnskap. Dilting etter USA er noe Norge burde avslutte straks.
Spennende/ informativ artikkel, men som smurfen sier er det jo ikke noe nytt for de som har gjort litt research. Det hadde vært innteresant med en artikkel om norske forhold, Per A. Ertresvaags sov mitt lille norge går inn på dette, men ikke de påstandene du skrev her ang; hjerneslag/ kreft. Jo større alternativ media blir her til lands jo vanskeligere blir det for pst/ cia og gjøre noe med disse tiders avlsøringer.
Uansett, en sammenligning med Hitler er vel litt drøyt, dog de muligens er av samme alen/ alien!
Meget god artikkel!
Her var det for meg info som satte ting i sammenheng. Absurditeten trer frem. At Nils Trædal skulle lide samme skjebne som Jan Masaryk var vel godt gjennomtenkt. Som et pek til andre som måtte våge røre borti saker de skal la ligge. (Kommer på mannen som “falt” ut av et hotellrom i København pga.dokumenter og planlagt avsløring om info ang.valget av hovedflyplass, om jeg husker riktig).
Var representanter på Stortinget dengang så redde for å ta oppgjør med det de MÅ ha skjønt var et overlagt drap? Hva og hvem fryktet de i så fall så mye at de ble “medsammensvorne” til å dekke over, for noen, et beileilig dødsfall?
Stilletiende, medskyldige, med kvaler i mange år muligens, vel vitende om at det ikke var et reelt demokrati i Norge dengang.
Da undres jeg over hva med nå. Hvorfor skulle det være ikke grunn til å tro at stortingsrepresentanter idag frykter for å snakke om hva de får innsikt i? Det er vel gitt signaler der i gården også idag for den som måtte komme på tanken å prøve seg på noe.
Med statuer på beliggenhet på hedersplasser i Norges hovedstad, må det virkelig være lov å spørre, etter denne viten fra artikkelen, hva i huleste gjør de der… Det er på tide å ta lua fra hånden og sette den på hodet igjen og bli rak i ryggen. Og gi hedersplassen til en mann som virkelig har fortjent den.
[...] http://www.nyhetsspeilet.no/2009/07/uncle-sam-i-oslo-statuer-illusjoner-og-fakta/ [...]
[...] http://www.nyhetsspeilet.no/2009/07/uncle-sam-i-oslo-statuer-illusjoner-og-fakta/ [...]