Our planet is just one of many details in much larger units. Photo: NASA

4
Cosmos
23.02.2009 8:03

Climate change in perspective

Climate change is one of today's most relevant topics, almost regardless of the point of view. The theme incorporates both scientists, environmental organizations, politicians, spiritual, and most others. In 2007, changed the awareness of climate change radically.

No one can no longer close our eyes to that the climate is drastically changing. The topic was put on the political agenda, both nationally and globally. Here in Norway exceeded most of the political parties together in something that would otherwise have been called overbudspolitikk, where they competed for the parties who would use the most money to reduce the planet's CO2 emissions.

2007 culminated with the Al Gore and the UN's climate panel received the Nobel Peace Prize, and that world leaders gathered in Bali to agree on measures against global warming. In my eyes, the best result of the focus on climate change and global warming that it has received much of the earth's population to see that the earth and everything and everyone on it are closely linked, and that what one does in a country, can not be seen as a national concern because it affects the whole and have effect in other places on the planet.

As with the environmental movement, see Native American tradition of climate change as a result of mankind's sins against Mother Earth. In spiritual communities it is customary to support this view.

These very different environments have in common that they see climate change as anthropogenic, and that they at least to some extent can be solved by restrictions on human activity.

Can our accustomed climate preserved?

It is a question most people, including climate scientists, environmental movement, political leaders and Nobel Peace Prize winners hardly able to see in a large NOK perspective. The reason is that in our culture sektoriserte and fragmented tradition sees the world as separate from our solar system, our galaxy and even larger systems.

Astrologers and astronomers have training in how to see that the earth is part of larger systems. Our planet is just one of many details in much larger units. As the astrologer, it is natural for me to seek information about what's happening in our solar system and in our galaxy, and to look for more cycles than those that occur within our solar system. Also, my capacity is limited, so I do not claim to have the ability to comprehend all the factors that influence. I dare not even claiming that I have an overview of the most important. Yet I mean to put climate change at a much larger perspective than we usually get submitted.

Our solar system

It's on planetary changes in the form of higher temperature, higher brightness, magnetic changes, etc. on nearly all the planets in our solar system. On Mercury see the changes seem to be going the opposite way. The overview that follows, I have taken from David Wilcocks article What is Ascension? (What is Ascent?), Published on DivineCosmos.com 26 September 2003.

This article is based again on the interplanetary Day After Tomorrow (Interplanetary Day after tomorrow), which is a more comprehensive document:

  • Sun: Since 1940 more activity than ever in the preceding 11,000 years.
  • Mercury: Unexpected ice at the poles are discovered, along with a surprisingly strong magnetic fields ... This is a planet that is supposed to be "dead".
  • Venus: 2500% increase in polarlysklarhet (corresponding to the Northern Lights) and major global atmospheric changes in less than 30 years.
  • Mars: "Global" warming, huge storms, ice disappearing at the poles.
  • Jupiter: Massive internal heating, over 200% increase in the clarity of the plasma cloud surrounding it.
  • Saturn: Violent lowering of the rotation speed during ~ 20 years, followed by surprisingly X-ray beam currents from the equator.
  • Uranus: "Really big, big changes" in brightness, increased global skyaktivitet.
  • Neptune: 40% increase in atmospheric clarity.
  • Pluto: 300% increase in atmospheric pressure, even though Pluto remove themselves from the sun.

Knowledge of these changes should remove all doubt that climate change is not due to underground activity alone. It is clear that the whole solar system is affected by the unusual forces. It also seems as if the part due to underground activity is minimal.

Vårt eget solsystem med vår egen sol (stjerne) og planeter. Illustrasjon: NASA

Our own solar system with our Sun (star) and the planets. Illustration: NASA

Sun exposure

The solar magnetic cycles has of course a huge influence on the earth. We can say that this is the cycle of the solar wind, which, among other things, proves that the Northern Lights when the magnetic field hits the Earth's atmosphere.

Last year it began to be referred to as solsyklus 24 NOAAs (National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration - subject to United States Trade Department) expert panel said in a press release 25 April 2007 that their expert panel was divided in perceptions about whether solsyklus 24 is a strong or weak cycle.

The expert panel predicts that the cycle will reach its peak from late 2011 to mid 2012.

Unknown planet?

In his book The Twelfth Planet (The Twelfth Planet) uses Zecharia Sitchin archaeological discoveries in the form of artifacts and writings from the Middle East to show that the earth was colonized by a civilization from outer space. Sitchin claims to be able to prove that the "gods", that is, the alien, came to us from an unknown planet in our solar system, a planet with an orbital period of 3,600 years, thus far beyond both Pluto and Eris, which has circulation times of respectively 248.5 and 557 years. It will only be visible from Earth at 3 points in its orbit.

Sumerians called the planet as "gods" came from for Nibiru, in Babylon was called the Marduk. Tim McHyde, who specializes in biblical prophecies, claims that it is this that is mentioned in Revelation. 8.11 in the Bible: "star's name was Wormwood ..." In astronomy, the environment, theories of an unknown planet called Nemesis. Somewhere I read that this planet has at least 32 different names.

Some sources also discusses a winged planet, or a planet with horns that would show up in the sky at the end of our age.

Spirit Iliuka, as channeled by Leif Havik (Iliuka.net), has said that we will wake up to the two suns. The late astronomer Dr. Robert S. Harrington at the U.S. Naval Laboratory, wrote in a report in the 80's that he believed that our sun has a twin in the form of a brown dwarf.

In the 1987 edition of the New Science and Invention Encyclopedia, there was an article that was based on findings from the Pioneer 10 and 11, which shows a planetary system consisting of a brown dwarf and a planet, and that has a path that includes two solar systems. Circulation time was estimated to be about. 3660 years. 99% of the time it spends between solar systems, but the speed increases when it comes close to NOK to be affected by the gravitational pull of one of the solar systems.

Astronomer Patryk Lykawka at Kobe University in Japan supports the theory that there is a large planet, which he said has about the same size as Earth. Last year, it published several articles on the theories of researchers at Kobe University, which is based on scientific facts and data simulation. One of them is in Danish on www.ing.dk.

It is claimed that the world's governments, the Vatican and the Illuminati are aware of the unknown planet's existence. It is claimed that the planet will only be visible to the south, and that there is a telescope in Antarctica whose mission is to scout for it. It is also claimed that the Jesuits sent up its own spacecraft to search for it, and the film of the planet as the spacecraft transmitted, are published on the internet. In fact, you find on the internet many videos and photographs that are given out to be of this planet, which is taken from outer space and other photo material derived from the earth.

If the planet is behind the sun, as seen from Earth, can it explain why it is not visible to astronomers the Earth-based telescopes. About this planet really exists, would its occurrence and presence in the solar system undoubtedly affect both the sun and all planets in the system greatly.

Finnes den ukjente planet X, Nibiru, der ute?

Is the unknown Planet X, Nibiru, out there? Photo: NASA

Our galaxy

Our solar system is located in a branch of the Milky Way. This side arm is stretched so far out that it is now about to lose its gravitational pull, it is claimed. It will mean that we are on about. 500,000 years will end up more centrally in the Milky Way. But it is so long that we do not need to concern ourselves with it now.

What is interesting about today is that our solar system has a cycle in relation to the galaxy's center. This is a slow cycle. Seen from earth moving Galactic center (the center of the galaxy or the galaxy's heart, or motor) to ca. 1 degree per. 72 years. In comparison, the sun moves around them. 1 degree per. day. Solar cycle is 1 year, as seen from Earth. (In reality of course this earth cycle around the sun.)

Just as the earth and all the planets in our solar system orbit around the sun circles the whole of our solar system around the center of our galaxy, the Galactic Center. Times we set up 72 years with zodiaksirkelens 360 degrees, we find that our galactic cycle is 25,920 years, ie ca. 26,000 years. We are now in the process of completing such a galactic cycle.

Spirit Iliuka replied affirmatively to my question if it's true that most of the change in the energies that come into our solar system now comes in through the Galactic Center. From the earth's history, we know that the major changes in the Earth's climate since many plants and animal species will disappear and be replaced by others with approx. 26,000 years. In a nostalgic perspective, it is perhaps sad, but this is completely natural processes.

The Earth is a living organism, which in turn is part of larger living organisms. Life can not conservation. Life processes are continuously evolving and changing. Even so, whether we like it or not.

Probably it is not desirable to keep the earth exactly as it is now. Most are well agreed that a lot here could have been vastly improved.

Selve senteret i vår egen galakse Melkeveien. Foto: NASA

The center of the Milky Way. Photo: NASA

Inter Galactic cycle?

Marine biologists have found evidence of an even larger cycle, a cycle of 62 million years. With 62 million-year intervals, they found that the species will disappear and that it appears completely new life forms that can not be explained by evolutionary theory. This may possibly be an intergalactic cycle. Personally I am rather against the notion.

It turns out that it is now in excess of 62 million years ago, recent quantum leap in evolution. It suggests that we can stand on the threshold of the next.

Attempts conclusion

Some of the climate change is probably anthropogenic. For me, it seems nevertheless clear that most of it is due to cosmic forces and cosmic rays, and here I have tried to show that there may be several sources of it. The probability is high that there are several factors of influence than I have been able to locate.

In different communities used different designations of the same coin. The cosmic radiation affects both our planet and everything and everyone in it. Cosmic radiation has the earth and we have been exposed to at all times. Without the cosmic radiation would not earth exists. Another term for cosmic rays is energy.

Now you have the energy or radiation from the cosmos higher frequencies / vibrations than we're used to here in the 3rd dimension. One of the results is the heating of the Earth's atmosphere. This means that the ice is melting at the poles, the oceans rise, and other cosmic forces causing frequent earthquakes and volcanic eruptions, so that plants, animals and people get new life conditions. I do not think it useless to fight against such forces. Then I think it is better to see them as necessary for the planet and mankind's ascension to the 5th dimension, and welcome them to the most spiritual communities do.

When we look at the planet we live on as an organism or a body - a celestial body - we can imagine that, like the human body goes through various stages of development. Maybe we can see today that the earth "puberty phase"?

About childhood has never so many advantages, it also has limitations. Puberty is a period of sometimes dramatic changes in and outside the body. Not all the changes experienced as pleasurable. Inevitable, they are in any case. And adult life has definitely some advantages when you first when the stage. Probably we will not want us back to "childhood" when the world first has been "adult", but find us well at home in the new state.

Is it okay to litter the environment and the earth? No, I think not. The Earth is our home. We should treat it accordingly. But we should remember that your home is to us, and not vice versa. It is wrong if it's important to have a perfect home than we who live here will expand us. Let us both expand and clean up after our activities!

Sources:

www.divinecosmos.com
www.swpc.noaa.gov
www.xfacts.com
ing.dk/artikel/84863? rss
Zecharia Sitchin: The Twelfth Planet (Book)
www.detailshere.com / niburu
www.angelismarriti.it
www.crystalinks.com
www.angelfire.com

VN: F [1.8.2_1042]
4.7 (9 votes)
9 Climate change in perspective, 4.7 6 9

What you can do


"Tell the media <strong>Skriv ut artikkelen</strong> Print this article Share / Bookmark »RSS Feed» RSS comment feed


About the author

Liv Bjøringsøy

Liv Bjøringsøy's astrologer and comes from the editors of the Zodiac. She has previously written articles in international maritime force. Of education, she is an economist and has most of his adult life been employed in private industry. She has worked a lot internationally and has always been concerned with society and international politics. In addition, she has acquired esoteric knowledge and insights from multiple disciplines. She sees it as important to help spread knowledge to as many as possible. In addition to writing on New Diary she combines all her knowledge and understanding of counseling and husrensing on the phone.

Contact the author | More articles by Liv Bjøringsøy (19) | Author's web site



Comments

4 comments

  1. Manito says:

    So great that this article comes here also Liv! A great initiative that Frank has been here and a leaking package. Looking forward to more stories from you, too! Hang on!

    UN: F [1.8.2_1042]
    3 (5 votes)
  2. Wunjo says:

    Interestingly found an article that shows that it even has ocean also on Venus. It is well for daring to draw the conclusion that what happens here on Earth now, is a natural development, but exciting it is.

    "Oslo (AFP):
    All-new discoveries from ESA's Venus Express spacecraft suggest that Venus may also have been a wet planet, with great sea.

    No sooner have we got used to the idea that Mars once had large oceans, as it turns out that the same may also apply to the earth's second neighbor planet, Venus.

    Sister Planet
    Today, Venus perhaps the solar system's most unpleasant planet. With 90 atmospheres pressure and a temperature of 460 degrees on the surface will lead melt and run away.

    But once you all have been very different. Venus lies between Earth and sun and is often called our sister planet, partly because they are so similar in size. Now it turns out that the similarities may have been even more striking once long ago.

    Large ocean
    There are pictures Venus Express has taken of our sister planet from May 2006 to December 2007, which suggests that Venus may once have had the great sea. Through infrared mapping, ESA researchers found that in the higher elevations on Venus are rocks that can be granite. Here on earth, granite is created in an interplay between plate tectonics (continental drift), the sea and volcanic eruptions.

    - This is not proof, but it is very consistent circumstantial evidence, "said Nils Müller, one of the researchers behind the study.

    Greenhouse effect
    Venus is with this even more interesting for scientists, who have assumed that there may have been oceans on Venus, and who have wondered where the water in this case has taken the road.

    ESA has for several years ago stated that to understand the greenhouse effect on Venus may have great significance for research into the greenhouse effects on our own planet. (AFP) "

    UN: F [1.8.2_1042]
    1 (3 votes)
  3. H says:

    Climatic Research Unit (CRU) their response to the courts (Freedom of Information Act) his demand for access to the raw data for the temperatures on earth we have "lost" DATA!

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/08/13/cru_missing/

    UN: F [1.8.2_1042]
    4 (6 votes)

Add a comment


You must be registered and logged in to post a comment. Lost your password?

Is science governed by paradigms, dogmas, or NWO directives?

Society

Is science governed by paradigms, dogmas, or NWO directives?


Indian prophecies about our time

Consciousness

Indian prophecies about our time


NASA looking for life out there when the evidence is here

Cosmos

NASA looking for life out there when the evidence is here


The Love Police visited Bergen

Video

The Love Police visited Bergen