Det går vel ikke å tenke seg att normal menneskelig kunnskaplöshet, udugelighet, inkompetanse mm er årsaken till de fleste feil som begås?
Eller er det mere sannsynlig att det skyldes att Stoltenberg har reptilgener?

Legg ned alle Rockefeller forretninger i hele verden!

Iflg dr Russell Blaylock har ikke leger i alminnelighet kunnskap om uavhengig forskning om emnet “skader som følge av vaksiner”. Farmamaffiaens milliard dollar lobbyister underskjenner enhver rapport som er en trussel mot deres årlige 3000 miliarder bussiness. Metodene kjenner man igjen fra den såkalte “tobakkvitenskapen” fra 60-70 og 80 tallet. Dette gjelder også farmamaffiaens diskreditering av NATURLIGE vitaminer som de hevder er virkningsløse eller direkte livsfarlige. Denne holdningen er så inndoktrinert i vestlig såkalt medisinsk “vitenskap” at vi stadig kjenner igjen denne påstanden fra feks VG og andre medier. Årsaken er selvsagt at farmaffiaens influens i hele det vestlige medisinske pardigmet er altomfattende, og følgelig er leger og legeutdanningen simpelthen ikke annet enn en forlenget arm av denne industrien og følgelig heller ikek kvalifisert til å uttale seg om ernæring og helse. Undanningen berører ikke dette emnet.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnQOYa8XX9M

Hvis du også har data på at nano er helt ok å bruke på bioorganismen vår hadde vært kjekt…

I disse tider.

1) Beijing Chaoyang Hospital har skrevet en rapport om 7 kvinner som ble syke på arbeidsplassen etter innånding av nanopartikler til bruk i industriell sammenheng. http://www.nanolawreport.com/tags/chaoyang-hospital/

2) Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne har utviklet en nanopartikkel som KAN brukes i vaksiner.

Utfa fakta 2) konkluderer (kortslutter) Engdalh med at da blir sikkert nanopartikler brukt i svineinfluensavasksinen og utfra fakta 2) at du kommer til å dø av den.

Jeg håper du ser hvor fullstendig urimelig hans konklusjon er.

Virker ikke som du er tilstrekkelig informert.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?aid=15092&context=va

Den finnes i vaksiner også, dette har da vært kjent lenge.

Vaccines which have been approved by the responsible government authorities for vaccination against the alleged H1N1 Influenza A Swine Flu have been found to contain nano particles. Vaccine makers have been experimenting with nanoparticles as a way to “turbo charge” vaccines for several years. Now it has come out that the vaccines approved for use in Germany and other European countries contain nanoparticles in a form that reportedly attacks healthy cells and can be deadly.

In 2007 researchers at the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) announced in an article in the journal, Nature Biotechnology, that they had developed a “nanoparticle that can deliver vaccines more effectively, with fewer side effects, and at a fraction of the cost of current vaccine technologies.” The article went on to describe the effects of their breakthrough: “At a mere 25 nanometers, these particles are so tiny that once injected, they flow through the skin’s extracellular matrix, making a beeline to the lymph nodes. Within minutes, they’ve reached a concentration of DCs thousands of times greater than in the skin. The immune response can then be extremely strong and effective.”

EPFL, Bioengineering researchers from the EPFL in Lausanne, Switzerland, have developed and patented a nanoparticle that can deliver vaccines more effectively, with fewer side effects, and at a fraction of the cost of current vaccine technologies, accessed in http://www.azonano.com/nanotechnology%20news.asp?catid=13.
2 Song Y, Li X, Du X, Exposure to nanoparticles is related to pleural effusion, pulmonary fibrosis and granuloma , European Respiratory Journal, 9/2009, 34(3): 559-567.

Fra http://www.theflucase.com

http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15092

Nanoparticles, promoted in the mass media as the new wonder revolution of science, are particles that have been produced vastly smaller than deadly asbestos particles which caused severe lung damage and death before being outlawed. Particles at a nano size, (nm = 0,000000001 Meter) fuse together with the membranes of our body cell membranes and, according to recent studies in China and Japan, continuously destroy cells once introduced into the body. Once they interact with the body’s cellular structure, they cannot be removed. Modern medicine euphemistically terms the phenomenon, a continuing infectious reaction.

Since the asbestos scandal, it has been established that particles in size a millionth of a meter, because of their enormous attractive force, penetrate all cells, destroying all those they come into contact with. Nanoparticles are far smaller than asbestos fibers.

The article describes tests carried out in 2008 at the elite Beijing Chaoyang Hospital on seven young women. All seven, ages 18-47 had been exposed to nanoparticles for 5–13 months in their common workplace. All were admitted to the hospital with shortness of breath and pleural effusions, or excessive fluids surrounding the lungs, inhibiting breathing. None of the seven had ever smoked and none were in any special risk group. Doctors carefully tested for every possibility and confirmed that the lung problems had a common origin—regular inhalation of nanoparticles in their factory. They had been exposed to Polyacrylat nanoparticles.

The tests confirmed the nanoparticles had set off a “super-meltdown” reaction in the patients. Despite all heroic efforts of doctors, two of the seven died from the lung complications.

In their report, the scientists concluded something so alarming it is necessary to quote at length:

“Immunological tests, examinations of bacteriology, virology and tumour markers, bronchoscopy, internal thoracoscopy and video-assisted thoracic surgery were performed. Surveys of the workplace, clinical observations and examinations of the patients were conducted. Polyacrylate, consisting of nanoparticles, was confirmed in the workplace. Pathological examinations of patients’ lung tissue displayed nonspecific pulmonary inflammation, pulmonary fibrosis and foreign-body granulomas of pleura. Using transmission electron microscopy, nanoparticles were observed to lodge in the cytoplasm and caryoplasm of pulmonary epithelial and mesothelial cells, but are also located in the chest fluid. These cases arouse concern that long-term exposure to some nanoparticles without protective measures may be related to serious damage to human lungs.“